To: Michael Oswald
Officer Michelle Luckey
Officer Charles Poetz
Kim Peoples
Attny David Blankfeld
CC: County Chair Marissa Madrigal
Couty Commission
I
understand Ozzie was killed September 17 despite the fact that you well
knew
( as did David Blankfeld) I had humane options for him and indeed had raised money
for his writ of review appeal ( $500). Why would you do that ? ( and I include David
Blankfled in that comment because he was completely involved, asks and well knows
I help in cases like this, and did nothing desdpite that information ...on vacation. .
( as did David Blankfeld) I had humane options for him and indeed had raised money
for his writ of review appeal ( $500). Why would you do that ? ( and I include David
Blankfled in that comment because he was completely involved, asks and well knows
I help in cases like this, and did nothing desdpite that information ...on vacation. .
My
concerns are significant also because the same week Ozzie was killed
MCAS
brokered a deal with FDNL to release another little dog that had actually killed a dog but as noted in the
record " you wanted him to have a second chance."
brokered a deal with FDNL to release another little dog that had actually killed a dog but as noted in the
record " you wanted him to have a second chance."
Are only dogs affiliated with FDNL and other large organizations allowed
"second chances"?
Not the dogs of the homeless? Why?
"second chances"?
Not the dogs of the homeless? Why?
You
well know that my placement history is very effective, thorough and
conscientious.
I have no idea after you knew my investment in Ozzie, the minor nature of his "crimes"
why our offers of humane alternatives were just ignored/not even acknowledged
( in case the writ of review did not go through for monetary reasons;I had the funds donated).
Ozzie had chances, his crimes were minor, he was a nice dog. you killed him anyway
after months of unnecessary solitary confinement, just carelessly snuffed out his life..
I consider that cruelty.
I have no idea after you knew my investment in Ozzie, the minor nature of his "crimes"
why our offers of humane alternatives were just ignored/not even acknowledged
( in case the writ of review did not go through for monetary reasons;I had the funds donated).
Ozzie had chances, his crimes were minor, he was a nice dog. you killed him anyway
after months of unnecessary solitary confinement, just carelessly snuffed out his life..
I consider that cruelty.
Meanwhile I am putting together resources for Pucky ( MCAS 541100) and Charlie
( MCAS 550945)
( MCAS 550945)
Please
don't kill them. I will deal with my concerns about the circumstances
surrounding Ozzie's
death ( this has happened before) at greater length later.
death ( this has happened before) at greater length later.
Thank you
Gail O'Connell-Babcock
503.625.4563
No comments:
Post a Comment