To: Kim Peoples
The Multnomah County Commission
Portland City Council
Repeatedly
it has been brought to your attention ( the correspondence and
documentation in the following August e-mail is only one of many) that
Multnomah County's regressive,ineffective cruel animal control agency
preys upon the public, issuing threats, fines and excessive penalties
often accompanied by the seizure, suspension of ownership and
the killing of companion animals for correctable often quite minor
offenses.The homeless are often charged as in a recent case $1500 in
fines and effectively denied legal representation by being denied
information that pro bono legal services are available. Minorities are
accused of faking their ignorance of English. Multnomah County sponsors
government animal abuse because of the laziness and indifference of
Multnomah County government when it pertains to animals. Multnomah
County government protects the comfort of long term employees not
public service
Attached above is another set of
tickets: " we are forcing surrender of your dog" ( almost always for
correctable minor offenses); "one more time and we will force the
surrender of your dog." virtually always meaning killing. Never once
does MCAS work with the public to solve problems.They have no owner
diversion programs; offer no prevention and education; and exist in a
culture that quite commonly operates above or outside the law, relying
exclusively upon primitive threats, excessive fines, and punishments
that solve nothing and only inflict alienation and pain. That is what
bullies do, govenrment sponsored. They are always on vacation and
absent/ impossible to reach: "Telephone hours are not currently ( or
ever) available.". Sometimes the entire upper management is out at the
same time. .
The fact that Multnomah County has
not responded to or addressed these problems (always in meetings; deaf
to public service) is the final insult to the citizens of this
community.
What does it take to for this government to work?
What is wrong with Multnomah County's representatives?
And
what does it take to get new government officials who care and act upon
compassion, decency and common sense and a real commitment to public
service?
We need those officials now.
Gail O'Connell-Babcock, Ph.D.
Citizens for Humane Animal Legislation/Watchdog
16004 SW Tualatin-Sherwood Road, # 508
Citizens for Humane Animal Legislation/Watchdog
16004 SW Tualatin-Sherwood Road, # 508
Sherwood OR 97140
Telephone: 503.625.4563
Sent: Mon, Aug 12, 2013 2:39 pm
Subject: Multnomah County's idiotic counter productive animal control policies: failing the community
Subject: Multnomah County's idiotic counter productive animal control policies: failing the community
To: Michael Oswald
Kim Peoples, Department of Community Services
Officer Charles Poetz
Jeff Cogen, County Chair
Multnomah County Commission
Portland City Council
CC: Robert Babcock
Multnomah County idiotic counter productive enforcement practices continue to fail animals and the community
Attached
find examples of the worlds worst enforcement policies practiced daily
by Multnomah county animal control officers whose only tools
(“corrective” actions) are escalating threats, punishment, fines and
extorted consent. It takes no training or education to engage in
threats. Tantrum tickets (next time I’ll get you” a favorite of a number
of officers and the agency as a whole) don’t solve problems, they
create them. Why fund such primitive appalling behavior?
When
you threaten citizens over incidents instead of helping find resources
to solve problems you are a very high cost pointless item in the county
budget. If recidivism occurs it is because you failed
in your “corrective” actions to find a genuine solution. I am going to
post the best “blah, blah I am going to get you next time” tickets every
week. For an explanation of what is wrong with MCAS enforcement along
with “corrective” solutions read the essay posted below.
For today the litany of threats by Officer Cherry (see attachment) is the ticket of the week:
“Any
new dog bite incidents will result in a suspension of ownership
request. Quarantine will be required to take place at the shelter and
Roscoe will be kept at the shelter pending the appeal hearing decision
or a default finding.”
Where
presumably Roscoe will read about the fates of errant dogs while in
solitary confinement “Security” (allowed 15 minute visits and a visit
from the priest). Intelligent communities have dog owner diversion
programs, education and mediation. We are stuck with regressive bullying
and an “unhealthy/untreatable” system that works for no one: man or
dog.
Gail O’Connell-Babcock
Telephone: 503.625.4563
No comments:
Post a Comment