With
Deference to all Scientists: this Research Report has been written
for all students and non-scientists to understand.
Abstract
As stated by University Researchers, Government
Scientists and International Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7%
of schoolgirls exposed to low-level microwave radiation (Wi-fi) are
at risk of suffering stillbirth, foetal abnormalities or genetically
damaged children, when they give birth. Any genetic damage may pass
to successive generations.
Wifi
a Thalidomide in the Making Who Cares?
Professor
John R Goldsmith, International / Advisor Consultant for R.F.
Communication, Epidemiology and Communications Sciences Advisor to
the World Health Organisation, Military and University Advisor,
Researcher; wrote concerning the low level exposure of microwave
irradiation (below thermal level) incident upon women:
“Of
the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to the 7th
week of pregnancy....”(1)
The level
of irradiation incident upon the women was stated, as from, five
microwatts per centimetre squared. This level of irradiation may
seem meaningless to a non-scientist; however, when I say that it is
below what most
schoolgirls will receive in a classroom of wi-fi transmitters, from
the age of approximately five years upwards, this level becomes more
meaningful.
A
distinction here must be made and a very important one: schoolgirls
are not women. Schoolgirls are children and
children are both neurologically and physiologically different from
adults. A child’s brain tissue / bone marrow has different
electrical conductivity properties than adults due to the higher
water content (2) (this renders the Specific
Absorption Rate obsolete). Children’s
absorption of microwave radiation can be ten times higher than
adults.
Permanent low-level microwave exposure can induce chronic
nitrosative and oxidative ‘stress’ thence, damage the cellular
mitochondria (mitochondropathy). This ‘stress’ can cause
irreversible mitochondrial DNA damage (mitochondrial DNA is ten times
more susceptible to oxidative and nitrosative ‘stress’ than the
DNA in the cell nucleus). Mitochondrial DNA is irreparable due to
its low histone protein content, therefore any damage (genetic or
otherwise) can be transmitted to all successive generations through
the maternal line. (3)
Hence, we
are subjecting each successive female generation to harm. Whether
these two ten-fold increases ‘merge’ to become 57.7% or are
additional, thence equal 67.7% of those to suffer, is a moot point.
Either way we are facing the equivalent of a pandemic. I was invited
to present a lecture at Brighton University recently and one Doctor
commented on a +60% foetal birth rate damage from exposed farm
animals. All mammalian species will of course suffer the same
consequence resulting from low-level microwave irradiation. There is
very little difference ‘biologically’ between our embryonic
cells.
I invite
the Reader to peruse my diagram and / or read my simple explanation
concerning the microwaving of the ovarian follicles in schoolgirls.
Simple
Explanation
Imagine
you are five years old, in school and sitting with a wi-fi laptop
near your abdomen. Theoretically, your ovaries can become irradiated
until you leave school at aged 16-18 years old. When you become
pregnant, every one of your follicles (to become eggs) will have been
microwaved. Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy child.
Should
you become a pregnant as a student, your embryo (for its first 100
days if it is female) is producing approximately 400,000
follicles (within its ovaries) for future child-birth.
The
problem is that these developing follicle cells do not have the
cellular protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your
‘Grandchild’ may have had every single follicle cell irradiated
and damaged prior to its conception. Therefore when your child
becomes an adult (with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater
likelihood of its child (your Grand-daughter) suffering the ailments
previously mentioned, during conception / embryonic and foetal
development stages.
Beyond
Belief
The
shocking truth is, not only was all of this known and documented long
before wi-fi was ever put in front of children, but the dangerous
biological effects were concealed (as they are to this day) from the
general public, in order to protect the industries profit.
Professor
Goldsmith writes:
“.....effects
from exposure to RF radiation in certain populations: reproductive
effects.....increased spontaneous abortion.....increased incidence of
childhood and other cancers.....” (1)
Confirming
this with more than 2000 references is the Naval Medical Research
Institute in their document: ‘Bibliography of Reported Biological
Phenomena (Effects) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to
Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation’ highlight ‘......Altered
Menstrual Activity / Altered Foetal Development.....’ (4)
The World
Health Organization’s ‘International Symposium’ Research
Agreement No. 05-609-04 ‘Biological Effects and Health Hazards of
Microwave Radiation’ emphasizes in its 350 pages: Biological
effects, health and excess mortality from artificial irradiation of
Radio Frequency Microwaves. Section 28 deals with problems
concerning Reproductive Function.
This
document was classed as ‘Top Secret’ and its contents withheld by
WHO and ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation
Protection). (5)
Eldon
Byrd, a scientist for the Naval Surface Weapon Centre of the US Navy,
in one of his 1986 lectures on the effects of low-level microwaves,
is referenced as stating:
‘.....we
can alter the behaviour of cells, tissue.....cause up to six times
higher foetus mortality and birth defects....’.
(6)
Finally,
the Mobile Telecommunications Industry carried out a very thorough
and exhaustive scientific study on its own product. This industries
conclusion was:
Sec.
7 “.....it can be concluded that
electro-magnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile
telecommunications range do
play a role in the development of
cancer.”
“.....Direct damage
on the DNA
as well as influences
on the DNA synthesis
and DNA repair mechanisms.....”
(7)
(Note I have underscored the relevant words here.)
Note:
DNA synthesis is essential for healthy embryonic / foetal / child’s
growth.
With
these few of the roughly 8000 research articles showing this
phenomena; in order to protect this industries’ profit, the United
States Defence Intelligence Agency sent a ‘document’ to ‘advanced
nations’ describing the problem and suggesting ‘how to deceive
the public’.
It
read:
“.....if the more advanced nations of the West are
strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there
could be unfavourable effects on industrial output.....exposed to
microwave radiation below thermal levels experience more.....”
(8)
NB:
Industrial output is of course...profit. A very relaxed exposure
standard also makes it very difficult to take the industry to court.
This
(and two other documents with ref. 8) then continues to list many
physiological and neurological dangers from low-level: below thermal,
microwave irradiation inc: blood disorders, heart problems,
psychiatric symptoms and ‘menstrual disorders’.
*Wi-fi
is of course, below thermal low-level microwave irradiation.*
In
order to appease the US Government, some Governments adopted the
ICNIRP guideline, whereby, the only safety limit is just six-minutes
of warming. Which means: if you do not feel too warm in six
minutes, wi-fi is deemed to be safe.
No
consideration at all has been given to the published ‘below
thermal’ cellular interaction as listed by several countries
including the United States; which were (and are) known to cause:
cancer, severe neuropathological symptoms, foetal defects and
literally hundreds of illnesses related to cellular disorders.
Countries
following ICNIRP continue to argue that their six minute warming
effect is all that is required regarding microwave irradiation.
Should
the Reader be wondering whether I am ‘as mad as a box of frogs’
and thinking ‘no government would ever harm its citizens for money,
especially pregnant women’; I invite the Reader to investigate
Government decisions behind: smoking, asbestos, BSE (mad-cow
disease), lead in petrol, experiments on 20,000 UK serving military
personnel serving in the 1960’s, thalidomide and of course Agent
Orange sprayed over the food crops in Vietnam. To this day, many
global birth defects stem from these Government / Government
Scientific / Military decisions: with
industrial advisors.
If
further evidence is required, I invite the Reader to read documents
released under the Freedom of Information Act; namely, Operations:
Pandora, MK Ultra, MK Chaos, Cointelpro, MK Delta, MK Naomi, MK
Search, Bluebird, Artichoke, Chatter, Sleeping Beauty and Grill
Flame.
Here,
secret experiments carried out by the Military / Government
scientists upon unsuspecting civilians, namely: students, servicemen,
psychiatric patients, poor, children over the age of 4 years,
pregnant women, Muslims, Catholics, prisoners, handicapped, deaf,
blind, homosexuals, single women, elderly, school children, ‘marginal
groups’ and dissidents; served to increase their knowledge and
understanding of; what is commonly known as...Stealth Warfare.
Progress
on the study of illnesses caused by low-level microwave irradiation
continues to this day. One current study on cancer and neurological
harm continues until 2018 and involves women who could be pregnant.
(9)
Progress
Reports are also fed back to Governmental Scientists:
“.....students will understand the nature of
RF...bioeffects research, including human / animal
studies.....students will become familiar with current state of
knowledge on potential health effects RF, such as cancer, memory
loss, and birth defects.” (10)
NB:
RF has become a generic term (Radio Frequency) to avoid using the
term ‘microwave’. It poses less ‘safety queries’ as the word
‘radio’ itself, which used to refer to ‘long wave radio’ was
domestically non threatening.
Intentional
Ignorance
Governmental
Intransigence forces a moratorium upon the risks of exposure to
future generations. Both the Communications Industry and
Governmental studies have proved that protein synthesis (the using of
chemical structures to ‘build’ the roughly 4050 foetal and 4500
adults designated biological / neurological structures) can be
influenced by low-level microwave irradiation. This moratorium seems
to spread to organizations either relying on Governmental funding, or
for whatever reason; acquiescence. However, not all research
departments suppress the truth.
A
brilliant paper published by Dundee University confirms that
low-level microwave irradiation, unable to cause any heating
(thermal) effect, can affect cellular signalling processes. (11)
The
Main Risks to Children
These
biological processes described as being ‘influenced’ by low-level
microwave irradiation may not just damage foetal growth; relying on
the same biological processes are:
Blood Brain Barrier
requires 18 months to form and protects the brain from toxins. It is
known to be effected.
Myelin Sheath requires 22
years to build its 122 layers. It is responsible for all thinking,
organ and muscle processes.
Brain requires 20 years
to develop (I can assure you, cell phones do not help in its
development).
Immune System requires 18
years to develop. Bone marrow and Bone Density are known to be
affected by low-level microwaves as are the immune systems’ white
blood cells.
Bones requires 28 years
to develop as mentioned the moisture content of children makes
both the ‘soft bones’ and marrow particularly attractive to
microwave irradiation. Bone marrow produces blood cells.
Clearly,
our decision makers are overlooking a child illness pandemic hitherto
unknown in our 40,000 generations of civilization; which can involve
over a half of the World’s exposed mothers / children.
The
Very Sad Truth
I
have been very honoured to address approximately 40 Royals,
Governments, Leaders of Governments, Leaders of Peoples and
Government Officials over the years.
My
address (text) to one King concerning the numbers of ill children was
placed on the internet. (12)
I
referenced over 200 cancer / leukaemia clusters in schools (up to the
time of data collection) from low level microwave transmitters in
schools. There were many different types of cancers, leukaemias,
miscarriages and breast cancers of staff. These continue, mostly
only recorded locally, to this day.
When
this was discussed in the English Parliament (as one of the EU
Countries involved), a Minister dismissed it and lied to the House of
Commons. My request to prove this lie was denied.
Possibly,
the most respected children’s charity in the World: UNICEF, joined
forces with the World’s leading authority on the effects of harm
from low-level microwave irradiation:
The
Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: in
their research document ‘Health Effect on Children and Teenagers’
found;
85%
increase in Central Nervous System Disorders
36%
increase in epilepsy
11% increase in mental retardation
82% increase in blood immune disorders and Risk
to Foetus. (13)
NB.
The Reader may think that the cell phone irradiation is different
from wi-fi as it has more power. In fact wi-fi can be more
harmful because of its lower power! Low power can enter the body and
cause harm. All electromagnetic waves are accumulative. If they are
below the body’s
threshold to cause activation of the necessary proteins required to
defend and repair tissues, the damage accumulates very slowly and is
undetectable like a cancer. Think of sunbathing on a cloudy day, you
can still burn your skin.
The
Good Guys
I have
a list of nine countries (some of whom I am working with) who are
actively, either taking wi-fi out of schools or in the legal
argument-stage of this process. I decline to publically name these
countries as my actions may interfere with their legal negotiations.
The
Parliamentary Assembly (Assemblee Parlimentaire) Council of Europe
Document 12608, published on 6.5.2011 in section 8.3.2. states:
‘.....ban
all mobile phones, DECTphones or Wi-Fi or WLAN systems from
classrooms and schools.....’
For
legal reasons this had to be changed to a ‘wired system is
preferred’. However, the meaning is clear.
In a
translated document, Professor Yuri Grigoriev of the Russian
Committee for Non Ionizing Radiation Protection wrote on 19.6.2012
‘.....recommend
the use of wired networks and not networks using the wireless
broadband access systems, including wi-fi, in schools and educational
establishments.’
A
document dated 25.3.2013 (updated from 19.3.2013) by the Executive
Committee of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine wrote a
letter to the Los Angeles Unified School District with the following
recommendation:
‘.....do
not add to the burden of public health by installing blanket wireless
internet connections in Los Angeles Schools.’
Just
prior to this in December 2012 the American Academy of Pediatrics
(representing 60,000 Paediatricians) wrote to Congress requesting
more protection from low-level microwave irradiation for children and
pregnant women: with regard to wi-fi in schools, they write:
‘.....this
is an unprecedented exposure with unknown outcome on the health and
reproductive potential of a generation.’
(14)
In
2002, 36,000 Physicians and Scientists etc. signed the ‘Freiburg
Appeal’. Ten years hence, it has been re-launched. It
specifically warns against the use of Wi-fi and the irradiation of
children, adolescents and pregnant women. ‘Freiburg’ is an
International Doctors’ Appeal.
The
Reader will appreciate that collectively there are approximately
100,000 of the World’s most knowledgeable professionals
expostulating this same warning.
As
an aside, should the Reader be wondering why I have not mentioned
school-boys and whether they can be affected in a similar way to
girls: the answer is ‘yes’.
DNA
sperm fragmentation from wi-fi levels of irradiation, have been
published. (15) It would require many more pages to comment upon
this phenomenon and there is already a plethora of data both
available and published.
Pulsing
/ Modulations
During the ‘Cold War’ conflict, whilst I was
collating effects from microwave pulses / modulations caused by brain
entrainment, resonance (both cyclotronic and circadian),
rectification (at boundaries within the body) generated by
electrically induced phase transition; it came to my attention that a
list needed to be published for all microwave communication systems.
(16)
In this Open Letter, I list 1 to 40 Hz (pulses /
modulations per second) and their corresponding neurological /
physiological response.
In his most explanatorily descriptive paper, Dr. Andrew
Goldsworthy writes.....
‘.....For example, Grigoriev et. Al. (2010) showed
that 30 days exposure to unmodulated 2450 MHz microwave radiation
triggered a small but significant increase in anti-brain antibodies
in the blood of rats.....which could then result in an auto immune
attack on the brain and / or nervous system. An example of an auto
immune disease of the brain is Graves disease in which the pituitary
gland (at the base of the brain) is affected.’
(17)
NB. 2450 M Hz is the wi-fi frequency.
If you add the pulse / modulation frequency to the
above; fatigue, depression, psychiatric problems (such as anger),
loss of appetite and problems with movement can also be induced.
The Bad Guys
With gargantuan profits to be made, it is of no surprise
that the English Parliamentary system choose to follow ICNIRP and
their well established ‘Active Denial’ policy.
I became familiar with our ‘corruption’ when during
the late 60’s 70’s, I was commissioned to investigate (under
a programme initiated by Sir William Melvin (1911)) corruption within
the hierarchy of the London Metropolitan Police and the non-elected
Members of the English Parliament. Should the Reader be dismissive
of such actions, I suggest looking at any of our Sunday newspapers
over the past 45 years, including now.
When a Reverend lady wrote to a Minister, Nick Gibb MP,
concerning Wi-fi in schools, his standard reply (which I have seen
many times) stated:
“.....advice given.....by UK
Health Protection Agency..... ‘There is no consistent evidence of
health effects from RF exposures below guideline levels and no reason
why schools and others should not use Wi-fi equipment.”
(18)
This
letter is designed to deceive (and it is very successful). Look to
the words ‘no consistent evidence’. Let me explain please.
If
I were to carry out an experiment on every single person who went
through the doors of your main airport on any busy day and told them
that they must drink one pint of beer and smoke ten cigarettes a day
forever; some would react immediately, especially children. Others
would react over days, weeks, months and years (many years in some
cases). Then there would be those who would thoroughly enjoy the
experiment and probably never be ill. That does not mean that
alcohol and cigarettes are safe. It shows that people are not
homogenous (all alike / identical). In other words, the conclusion
of my experiment would be that there is: ‘no
consistent evidence’.
Other
Ministerial letters usually say: “most of
our research” or “most
of our scientists” both of which are
equally meaningless.
What
they never say is: Wi-fi is safe.
It
will come as no surprise to the Reader to learn that I have been
refused permission to have a face-to-face meeting with my MP, Mr Mel
Stride. Hence my Member of Parliament has successfully brought the
‘shutters down’ on any access I may have had to Government. This
act by Mr Stride became a ‘feature’ in our West Country newspaper
by leading Journalist Paul James. (19)
During
my last attempt to contact my MP, his Secretary, Dominic just hung-up
the telephone on me.
Years
ago, when I started to ‘advise caution’ re microwaving children /
pregnant women; the Academic Registrar of my own University (Exeter)
forbade me from ever communicating with it, ever again. A similar
message came from Dr. Jamie Harle of the Open University (Medical
Physics), who said: “Your work is too
political.”
Clearly
in England, some universities and some parliamentary persons are more
afraid of governmental ‘reprisals’ than telling the truth.
Regardless of the consequences.
Two
Womens’ Stories
The
Real Price of Intentional Ignorance and Greed. Those Consequences.
Ten
telephone calls a day would not be unusual for me. I even receive
calls Christmas Day / Easter Sunday. Two calls which summarize those
from women are illustrated below. Both are actual conversations.
“.....my
daughter had just died. I am holding her hand. She has just had her
11th birthday and
she was number 11 to die since the transmitter for Wi-fi was put
near her and others’ desk.....”
“.....my
child is one of several with cancer / birth genetic problems. These
only started after the transmitter was turned on. My worries are
two-fold and take every second of my life. Will my child ever marry
or find a partner and be happy? What will happen when I die? I
know I will die worrying. Regardless of who is to blame, it is me,
the Mother who carries guilt and responsibility.....”
(20)
I
Ask for Readers’ Help, Please.
Imagine
57.7% of all of the schoolgirls with Wi-fi in their classrooms: all
day all year all through their school career, in every
country using it, in the World!
In
just two generations we could have more dead / sick infants than
resulted from both World Wars. And, these are not my figures, they
come from Government advisors / research.
Advanced
requests for this ‘Paper’ have been received from Royalty,
Governmental Officers (outside of the UK) and people I will describe
as ‘interesting’.
As
shutters fall blocking every direction I try to turn, I ask: “Can
the Reader succeed in preventing this ‘Pandemic’ where I will
fail?”
I
have two requests:
Would
a Royal or Leading Governmental Official please ask the British
Prime Minister, face to face, why he told my MP, Mr Stride, that he
is ‘too busy’ to see me for just one hour to discuss this issue.
If
every Reader sends just two copies of this Paper to people who may
be able make a decision (preferably influential women); with
mathematical progression the original 100 advanced requests will
soon land on a desk of somebody who can make a difference.
International
Challenge
When
I am invited to speak in countries, I invariably end up on the radio
/ TV news / documentary channels. Thence, I issue a challenge:
I
ask for any scientist(s) from industry / government to ‘humiliate’
me live ‘on-air’ with their expert knowledge by answering one
question:
“What
is the safe level of microwave irradiation for the ovarian follicles
during the first 100 days development of the embryo?”
To
date, not a single scientist will appear and face me.
I
mention this because it is a question the Reader can ask any decision
maker, school Principal / Governor etc.
Should
any person provide the answer, the next statement is:
“Fine
we will send it to a Leading Scientific Journal for independent
Peer Review.” (With your research). (21)
The
Solution
Education
need not suffer if Wi-fi is withdrawn world-wide. We have telephone
lines fibre-optic cable.
The
argument against these options is the cost. Compared to the future
medical costs (forgetting the human cost), phone / fibre-cable shows
to be a very cheap option.
Thank
you.
Barrie
Trower
3 Flowers
Meadow
Liverton
Devon
TQ12 6UP
United
Kingdom
In UK -
01626 821014
World
00 44 1626 821014
September
1st 2013
(This Paper
is copyright free)
Epilogue
Please note I have
always worked free of charge and will represent any person in the
world without cost. PLEASE SEE
ADDENDUM
Addendum
Recent Publications
Professors’ /
Doctors’ Panagopoulos, Johnasson and Carlo describe in their (June
2013 Published) Paper how man-made electromagnetic waves (as used
in the communications industry) can cause interference, hence induced
oscillations, from these polarized waves. This in turn, can induce
biological alterations and render the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate)
obsolete.
They write:
Man-made
electromagnetic waves...they are polarized...
....can produce
interference effect...This induced oscillation will be most intense
on the free particles which carry a net electric charge...a part of
its energy...is transferred to the charged / polar molecules of the
medium...within biological tissue there will be additional energy
absorption by the water dipoles...proteins, lipids or nucleic acids,
which will also be forced to oscillate by the applied field.
...man-made
EMF’s can produce severe biological alterations such as DNA damage
without heating the biological tissue...may lead to cancer,
neurodegenerative deceases, reproductive declines or even heritable
mutations...conductivity varies for different tissues and different
field frequencies..The
relative permittivity of an adult brain is calculated to be around
40 while the corresponding value for a young child’s brain is
between 60 and 80 resulting in almost double the radiation
absorption and SAR...
...SAR offers
no information at all with respect to frequency, waveform or
modulation... (Ref (22))
Dr Dimitris
Panagopoulos, Dep. of Biology, University of Athens also writes in
his 2013 paper: Electromagnetic Interaction Between Environmental
Fields and Living Systems Determines Health and Well Being:
Disturbances in
the communication between individual body clocks can desynchronize
the circadian system, which in turn may lead to unwellness, chronic
fatigue, decreased performance, obesity, neuropsychiatric disorders,
and the development of different diseases...
...endogenous
electrical balance in living organisms cannot occur in the presence
of unnatural man-made electromagnetic pollution..... GSM
mobile phone radiation is found to cause DNA damage on insect
reproductive cells (gametes) and adversely affect reproduction for
intensities down to 1 microwatt per centimetre squared after only a
few minutes exposure..... (Ref (23))
References
1.
|
Professor John R.
Goldsmith
|
Possible
Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation
Environmental
Health Perspectives
Sup.
6 Dec. 1997 P. 1580
|
2.
|
Microwave News
|
Children’s
Brains are Different
May
3rd.
2010 P.3
|
3.
|
Andrea Klein & Barrie
Trower
|
Wireless
Laptops and Their Transmitters Using Microwaves in Schools
P.3 (Undated)
|
4.
|
NMRI
|
AD750271
Research Report
MF12.
524.015-004B
4-10-1971
Bethesda,
Maryland, USA
|
5.
|
WHO
|
Biological
Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation
International
Symposium, Warsaw, Poland (1973)
With
US Dept of Health, Food and Drug Administration
Document
05-609-04
|
6.
|
Microwave Mind Control
|
Mind
Control and the UK
Chapter
4. Tim Rifat
P.83 2001
|
7.
|
Hennies Neitzke -
Voight
|
Mobile
Telecommunications and Health Review of Current Scientific
Research
T-Mobile
Hannnover
April
2007 Section 7
|
8.
|
US Defence Intelligence
Agency
|
DST
18105-076-76
March
1976
NB:
DST-18105-074-76 and ST-CS-01-169-72 also refer to this phenomena
|
9.
|
Barrie Trower
|
Most
Confidential Report on the TETRA (Airwave) Communication System
Strictly
for the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS)
June
2009
|
10.
|
P. Phillips, L.Brown, B.
Thornton
|
US
Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
Course
No. 11 Page 40
Sonoma
State University
As
a study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights
Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons
Project
Censored: Media Freedom Foundation
|
11.
|
J. Simon C. Arthur
|
MAPK
Aclivation by Radio Waves
MRC
Protein Phosphoryiation Unit
School
of Life Sciences
University
of Dundee
DD4
5EH UK
Published
by Journal of Biochemistry (405) e5 e6 2007
|
12.
|
Barrie Trower
|
www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Barrie
Trower SA.pdf
|
13.
|
|
Electromagnetic
Fields from Mobile Phones: Health Effects on Children and
Teenagers
Russian
National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection
April
2011
|
14.
|
|
Private
letters
(available
on internet) as titled and dated in text
|
15.
|
C. Avendano, A. Mata, C.A
Sanchez Sarmienta, G. Doncel
|
Use
of Laptop Computers Connected to Internet Through Wi-fi Decreases
Human Sperm Motility and Increases Sperm Fragmentation
Nascentis
Medicina Reproductiva, Cordoba, Argentina
Dept
of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School,
Norfolk, Virginia (2012)
|
16.
|
Barrie Trower
|
The
Communications Industry is in the Position Where it is Sprialling
out of any Person’s Ability to Control it
An
Open Letter (undated)
|
17.
|
Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy
|
The
Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields Problems and
Solutions
March
2012 P.14
|
18.
|
Stuart
Gallimore, Director of Children’s Services
|
Personal
Letter. Nick Gibb MP
House
of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
30
August 2011
|
19.
|
Paul James
|
Physicist:
I’m Stopped From Seeing my MP
Mid
Devon Advertiser
3.5.13 P.
13
|
20.
|
|
Personal
Conversations
I
am with holding their private telephone numbers for privacy
|
21.
|
|
Nature
Publications Nature or Scientific American
75,
Varick Street, 9th
Floor, New York, NY 10013-1917, USA
|
22.
|
Dimitris
J. Panagopoulos,
Olle
Johansson &
George
L. Carlo
|
Evaluation
of Specific Absorption Rate as a Domestic Quantity for
Electromagnetic Fields Bioeffects
4.6.2013
Pages i) 1 ii) 2 iii) 4 iv) 6
PLOS
ONE June 2013 Vol 8 Issue 6 e62663
|
23.
|
Dimitris
J. Panagopoulos
University
of Athens
|
Electromagnetic
Interaction Between Environmental Fields and Living Systems
Determines Health and Well-Being
Electromagnetic
Fields: Principles Biophysical Effects
ISBN
978-1-62417-063-8
Editors
M.H Kwang and S.O Yoon
2013
Nova Sciences Publishers, Inc
Pages
i) 20 ii) 35
|
